четвъртък, 2 юни 2016 г.

Black square – White square, Visible – Invisible


My ArtBook Black square – White square Visible – Invisible, 1987 – 1995 was shared only with few friends of mine. There was no point. And I like anonymity. There is a deeper and more immediate communication, where poetry and reality merge. That is what I like.

Last year I shared it with Krassi Roussev, because he was exploring this kind of artistic activity in Bulgaria, and before the coup d’etat, with my gang of 10 Varna artists at the time, we had created  books of similar genre, in small print, less than 15 books. I had to provide the conceptual basis for the presentation at Veliko Tarnovo University, especially because of the included inside picture Invisible Square in Invisible Field. Instead, there was this panting communication, troubled by deadlines and circumstances, in which I succeeded at the last moment, while travelling with Biomet to Varna, to send him on the road something that under the pressure of the lurking passion had already escaped the conventionality of the description and THAT COMMUNICATION is the verbal picture, written with Lenovo 350 A, sent at 4:25; you can see it below and which the following day together with my book was presented by Krasi at the University forum…it was the 16th November, Tuesday… 

He didn’t call until Friday. I was embarrassed and didn’t call. He had fallen sick. Leningrad University graduates were brutal in their resistance, turmoil occurred in the hall. There were however contemporary-minded professors that supported him. You have no idea, Vesso, what is it to work like that! Sure, I don’t have… 


At an exhibition dedicated to contemporary painting at Rayko Alexiev Gallery, curated by a very young fellow, my ArtBook was at last presented, accompanied by my verbal picture – here it is. The orthography and punctuation are preserved as they are.


„,

1. Black square – White square, Visible – Invisible is a book, which describes in a simple way a complete vision. I believe that artist’s work is to broaden the horizon of the senses through his everyday practice. The separate steps are linked on this road, that is the reason to recall them briefly.

2. In my first exhibition – Terrain and Constructions, my main quests could even be seen from the title.
While installing the works I found to my surprise that they possess “inspiration” and “presence”, something which was beyond my learning experience 

The presence, the impact of the work was an issue beyond the formal quests and experiments. I realized that the “magic” lies in the Process modeling, not just in the Form modeling and its positioning.

The “unity” between environment and structure in Water dragon resulted. I have also realized, that during creation the relations environment - construction become objective in the human and through the human and his perception and potential. The “presence” of the material object has no material medium or at least not within our sensory model. Our culture defines an already existing world. The magic culture creates it.

Such perceptions and practices are not strange to us, Bulgarians, they are the basis on which our view of the world and our rituals are founded, they represent the “other paradigm” of our ancient culture. It is based, as we all know, on the triad Sky-Man-Earth, where darkness and light take place, not the simple and impersonal Subject-Object.

The learning issue in the avant-garde physics is similar  - we don’t know what happens to the observed object, if not “observed”, does it exist at all…

I was seeking the Answer simultaneously in the publications of Scientific American and in the notes of Se-ma Ts’ien… and of course in the alternative cognitive practices accompanying the Hippie movement.

3. Each thing has a form; the material object and its impact also have a form; we recognize them for the form.

The sculpture form of the “Dyonisius wheel” is a complex distorted surface, obtained by stretching thin leather over a wooden geometric construction. Its form naturally follows the tendencies of the internal structure. The work presents in a concrete from the mental construction with ritual meaning. The “Dyonisius wheel” thus expresses clear quests of world view. It conveys them a form and through the work they could be perceived and experienced.

4. I believed we are exploring and experiencing the staging of the ancient culture now and through the prism of the present perceptions and convictions and that makes it up to date, it takes place “today”.

“Magical space Tangra” arose in this conceptual atmosphere. I covered the windows of the gallery with black foil and divided the World into “inside” and “outside”, into micro space and macro space. I perforated a hole in the foil so that the outside world was projecting inside and I was dealing with those two superimposed images. A beam of light glided through the space of the gallery and you could feel the hall “hanging” on it and rotating with the Earth in the infinite. From the Sun the light was traveling 8 minutes before bringing the images in my space. May be every thought and feeling were projecting outside. The world was taking place within and through the man. Magical space.

5. In the years that followed I studied Yi Jing and the achievements of the Great Yantra.

The significant work of that time is “Pyramid of air”. High 45 m, it consisted of 4 ropes marking out its edges. Its base was inscribed in a circle, outlined with white mosaic, the idea was when the grass grows “the circle will visually disappear, while still being there”. I raised the pyramid with a helium balloon at sunrise on 21st June 1989, at the lawn next to Hristo Botev hall. In those dimensions, edges were barely visible but spectators claimed to have seen! the pyramid’s wall as if made of glass, there were also other ecstatic occurrences.


















Veselin Dimov. Invisible Square in Invisible Field. Painting. No material. 1995

My book summarizes part of my experience so far. It englobes the periods after “the end of abstraction” of Malevitch. Starting from the very material, paper and watercolor of “Black square in white field” through the visible and the invisible to the last page, “Invisible square in invisible field”

Apparently, the background and the square are “invisible”, they have no material medium, in fact there is NO painting, it appears in the MIND, just like the previous “material” paintings.
The world is in the MIND. It IS the World.

Several years earlier, day and night I was drawing spatial structures and constructions for the Great Yantra. The thought patterns especially as that of the four-dimension sphere are an exciting experience – imagine two spheres penetrating into one another, each point of the one touching each point of the other. The world described by the patterns of our traditional culture is of this kind. Domesticated and shells are alive even today.

6. I am convinced that processes as Great Yantra could be expressed with the image of penetrating each other dodecahedron and icosahedron, each peak of the one touching all the peaks of the other, thus producing consistently and simultaneously in the so concluded spaces everything mind-achievable.

7. Art is an Insight Act. If accompanied by an activity, then its traces bear its image – it represents to us the message and the work.

There is an inspiring text of “Katha Upanishad”, where the insight breathes.

“Beyond the senses are the objects;

Beyond the objects is the Mind;

Beyond the Mind is the Intelligence;

Beyond the Intelligence is Atman;

Beyond Atman – the Unmanifested!

Beyond the Unmanifested – the Spirit;

Beyond the Spirit there is nothing

Nothing – Pure consciousness “

The text dates back to the 17th century and is published in a book about the Great Yantra. I don’t mean a geographic book about the river and our old capital.

Няма коментари:

Публикуване на коментар