State and Municipality (and recently NGO
distributing municipal and state funds) are both the largest producer (through
the act of entrustment) and the largest customer of art of professional quality or of imitating professional
standards quality. This is a self-sufficient process that aims at
presenting a non creative environment as normal and
"market". The gallery is the place of presentation. The work done is a selection
on a given topic, a presentation the collected and its reporting in the
media. This system functions due to the
regulations of the economic team, which first grants
money and then approves the cost. The comparative analysis of the
work done has
demonstrated that the results of money spent are comparable with international
practice and from this perspective the
presentation is art.
I'll tell you - once in the gallery it is
art. Otherwise might be a hellhole. It’s
called Social art. Not long ago such an act was "curated" in the National gallery.
The only
difference between this "creative work" and normal is that in this
post-socialist practice, the creative result and the
artistic contribution that should be the result from a creative process is defined
preliminary before the
creative act, its
result is set as known and comparable with international practice.
It is the same like to discover America before you left and to prove before departure, it has been discovered like that (there is no risk whether it
will be discovered, it is already discovered) and there is no risk to venture. What if you
don’t discover it, you will get fired - right? Wife, children, family? The absurdity is obvious, but the only real
existing practice carried out by the state and municipalities is the management of cultural process. The
requested expert potential is the economic
skills to budget "some money" and later lawfully from an audit perspective, not from art perspective, that money to be absorbed and spent.
A funny
story some years ago beautifully illustrates the practice. The
organizers of an International
Music Festival decided to steal (to absorb lawfully :) one million lev for the festival. To get away with that, the Accounting division of the budgeting organization should match the amount with fees and expenses of the world-famous violinist, the chief economist should
have at least heard about, in order the overspending to sound
convincing. They wrote down that Yehudi Menuhin would be performing. The money was
allocated. The failure occurred when a famous
journalist, a month before the concert of Yehudi Menuhin called him into his
office to ask for an interview prior to his arrival in Bulgaria. Surprised that
the Maestro has not even heard that there is such a festival, let alone that he should participate. The journalist, outraged, reported the case in the newspaper.
You will
ask what happened with the money!? Well, the money has already been allocated! They absorbed them :)
For the auditors they wrote that the maestro was sick and so the concert failed. There is a
subtle detail. Budgeting in
Bulgaria is precedent-based - meaning if you got away with that once, it becomes a successful practice for insiders. Did you get it? I will tell you. The next year it was no longer necessary to seek a
world famous violinist for the scheme. They just
copied last year's budget.
Medium level culture budgets are
copied with variations of at least forty
years. There is no art market in Bulgaria as you
can see. There is a market of schemes. Do not expect the so cultivated
experts of spaces representative for
the authority, such as city and state galleries, to
organize market, let alone fight for your art at the international market.
The boss of the Institute of
Biotechnology, whose Design department I created, was
very funny. He was completing the budget as follows "Over the coming year we will create three ingenious
discoveries, fifteen talented
innovations and about forty standard scientific contributions in our research activity." After
this bombastic statement the
figures were filled in. He had them, because he was
our guy. That’s what I wanted to tell you. Seven
years after the October Revolution Ilf and Petrov have already described it. So there over the counter of the
pavilion a notice in red letters is displayed: BEER ONLY FOR
UNION MEMBERS.
Socialism is one of the greatest achievements of our civilization. In socialism selection is done
according to belonging, not according to qualities. This freedom of natural selection and the accompanying
freedom from responsibility
for the consequences of the actions – that is the victory of
Socialism over Common Sense.
And "common sense" as Einstein says is
the accumulated prejudices up to 18 years. Take it easy. The party is
going on. You are such losers! Take
your bucks and listen to what daddy has to tell you!?
Now
seriously. The creator in this kind of creativity apparently is not the artist. The artist is only
the performer. He is salary
remunerated – looking for the budget. He has the
position named artist. In fact, he
is a contractor and not an author, he only performs works by already known artists. These works are usually foreign, and their subjects, time, work and ideas have nothing to do with our reality – therefore
they are politically and socially toothless. But as in the Yehudi Menuhin scheme you can complete with quasi creative, pseudo cultural activity
the European standards for culture expenditures in
a normal European country.
Money for AUTHORS - artists, playwrights,
writers and any other art creators is not provided. Right, uh? Write something to change the
pattern! And moreover culture dominates
the minds. It is not just a tool of the authority, it is
authority itself. The rest is administration. We will import culture. From abroad. The proper culture. Not ours. We with our own resources, we reproduce foreign potential. Foreign creativity. And we'll be just performers. Elegant, isn’t it?!
Culture and Freedom are natural human rights. Culture is
generating and cultivating of values and their free exchange. The only real
capital are the ideas and creativity.
The entrepreneur is a person whose ideas and practices create
opportunities. The artist is an innovative entrepreneur who has the potential to continually generate opportunities. Realization of
potential is the economy of culture. Culture of the economy. Art is personal contact
with the Spirit and the Truth,
which we can experience together, which is Culture.
Have you got 5 stotinki? Look at the coin from one
side - there is a picture – it is called edge. There is a digit on the other side. Without the image, the digit does not cost anything. The image represents authority, within whose patrimony the standard of value exchange is secured. Value is Culture. Culture is authority. The
authority defines the objectives "evaluating" them. A digit is quantitative, not qualitative measure of comparability with other value. The
free exchange of comparable values is the foundation of our society. Without
culture and without freedom it is impossible.
Няма коментари:
Публикуване на коментар